Not Signed In
Advocacy
African American
Aging
Agriculture
AIDS
American Government
American History
Anthropology
Art
Art - Architecture
Art - Dance
Art - Literature
Art - Music
Art - Painting
Art - Performing Arts
Art - Photography
Autism
Biography
Business
Communications
Conflict Resolution
Criminal Justice
Cultural Studies
Disabilities
Discrimination
Economic Justice
Education
Entertainment
Environment
Family
Fiction
Gay/Lesbian
Gender Issues
Health
History
Human Rights
Immigration
Intl. - Africa
Intl. - Asia
Intl. - Australasia
Intl. - Europe
Intl. - Latin America
Intl. - Middle East
Law & Society
Mature Subjects
Media
Native American
Nature
Political Science
Popular Culture
Psychology
Religion - Christian
Religion - Islam
Religion - Judaism
Religion - Other
Self Help
Sociology
Sports
Transportation
Travel
Urban Studies
War - Asia
War - Europe
War - Middle East
War - World War I
War - World War II
Women
Youth
Texas Hospitality (2003)

DVD | B&W
3 min | Full Screen.

Directed by Michael Pfaendtner
ISBN 978-0-8026-0497-2
Price:  $9.95* Home Video includes Public Library Circulation rights.
ISBN 978-0-8026-0498-9
Price:  $109.95**  Academic and Institutional price including Public Performance rights for non-paying audiences.
 
Consumers Reviews


Summary If you knew your next meal would be your last, what would you choose?

Until recently, the Texas Department of Criminal Justice provided a variety of answers to this question on their website, making available the final meal requests and last statements of over 300 executed offenders beginning in 1982.

Using nothing more than photographs and type, filmmaker Michael Pfaendtner’s documentary short, Texas Hospitality examines the final meal requests of ten of these executed offenders and in the process, offers a revealing look at the individuality and humanity of these condemned men and women as they awaited their imminent demise.

One by one, the image of each offender fades up along with their name, execution date and details of their conviction. As the conviction fades away, the screen then begins to fill randomly with food selections, in some instances covering the entire screen with type. Despite the filmmaker’s strong feelings against capital punishment, the seemingly ambivalent attitude of this film leaves it open to interpretation. While the heinous nature of these crimes makes a compelling case for the death penalty, there is also the realization that these were still human beings, facing one final decision before their lives were terminated.